← Active opportunities
OpenSources SoughtAmended

R499--PRIVACY ACT REQUEST FULFILLMENT

Solicitation number36C10D26Q0196

VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF · VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF · VETERANS BENEFITS ADMIN (36C10D)

View opportunity on SAM.gov ↗
Response deadlineSep 8, 2026, 7:00 PM UTC
Deadline status5 days remaining
PostedAug 31, 2026
Record refreshedSep 2, 2026
Place of performanceDepartment of Veterans Affairs Veterans Benefits Administration Acquisition Division 1800 G Street NW, Washington, DC, 20006, United States

Opportunity summary

Source-cited

This Sources Sought notice from the Veterans Affairs seeks input on capabilities related to Privacy Act Request Fulfillment. The response deadline is September 8, 2026, and submissions must follow specific portal guidelines. [4]

Key points

  • Reporting requires operational, quality, and SLA metrics. [1]
  • Optional capabilities include portal services and enhanced analytics. [2]

Watch items

  • Submission must be via GSA MRAS RFI if possible. [4]
  • Iterative deployment and agile development are emphasized. [3]

Sources

  1. Technical_Appendices.docxContractor-provided distribution portal should be optional if the Government provides a GFE portal. | | Reporting and analytics | BI dashboards, EDW or enterprise reporting, customer feedback data | Requires operational metrics, quality metrics, SLA metrics, backlog, access rate, duration, and customer signal reporting. | | Cloud and DevSecOps | Cloud or other hosting environment capable of satisfying applicable VA A&A/ATO requirements; separated non-production and production environments; CI/CD, monitoring, and logging | Requires ATO support, environment separation, vulnerability management, release controls, rollback, and audit evidence. | ## Appendix D - Information Processing and Automat
  2. Technical_Appendices.docx## Appendix G - Optional Capabilities and Modular Services The Government may consider optional CLINs or modular task areas to preserve flexibility, improve competition, and enable future modernization without expanding the base requirement unnecessarily. | Optional capability | Description | Value | | --- | --- | --- | | Optional completed-response portal services / transition support | If exercised, provide or transition completed-response distribution capabilities, including secure requester access, package download, reminders, feedback capture, accessibility support, and access analytics until or unless a GFE/VA.gov-hosted portal is available. | Improves customer experience and reduces p
  3. Technical_Appendices.docxSource materials emphasize iterative deployment, agile development, release planning, regression testing, deployment checklists, rollback planning, production monitoring, and hypercare. * Transition planning should identify pre-award, post-award, mobilization, go-live, hypercare, and steady-state activities. * Release governance should distinguish maintenance, emergency/hotfix, optimization, minor, and major releases. * Deployment artifacts should include schedules, test evidence, Go/No-Go decisions, user communications, rollback plans, and post-deployment validation. * Agile delivery should use sprint planning, backlog management, traceability, HCD/user feedback, product roadmap, and KPI-dr
  4. Official SAM.gov noticeThe SAM.gov RFI is only for firms not able to access and submit a response via the GSA MRAS RFI.

Generated from the public notice and source-backed solicitation passages. Confirm important requirements in the cited brief and official documents.

Public-source intelligence

Source-backed opportunity brief

7 citations · 5 sources

Contractor-provided distribution portal should be optional if the Government provides a GFE portal. | | Reporting and analytics | BI dashboards, EDW or enterprise reporting, customer feedback data | Requires operational metrics, quality metrics, SLA metrics, backlog, access rate, duration, and customer signal reporting. | | Cloud and DevSecOps | Cloud or other hosting environment capable of satisfying applicable VA A&A/ATO requirements; separated non-production and production environments; CI/CD, monitoring, and logging | Requires ATO support, environment separation, vulnerability management, release controls, rollback, and audit evidence. | ## Appendix D - Information Processing and Automation Capabilities The future service should support structured, semi-structured, and unstructured information.

Scope

## Appendix G - Optional Capabilities and Modular Services The Government may consider optional CLINs or modular task areas to preserve flexibility, improve competition, and enable future modernization without expanding the base requirement unnecessarily. | Optional capability | Description | Value | | --- | --- | --- | | Optional completed-response portal services / transition support | If exercised, provide or transition completed-response distribution capabilities, including secure requester access, package download, reminders, feedback capture, accessibility support, and access analytics until or unless a GFE/VA.gov-hosted portal is available. | Improves customer experience and reduces paper delivery while preserving Government optionality to use a GFE/VA.gov-hosted portal. | | Customer communications | Acknowledgement, status, final availability, bounce-back handling, non-access follow-up, survey integration. | Improves transparency and reduces repeated inquiries. | | Additional record types | Loan Guaranty, VR&E, Education, rating decisions, TERA memoranda, additional medical or military records. | Allows growth while preserving controlled scope. | | Brokering to other VA organizations | Route or coordinate requests requiring other VA organizations or systems. | Expands enterprise utility without forcing all capability into the base. | | Package reuse / duplicate reduction | Reuse previously fulfilled packages or document sets when valid, track repeat requests, avoid duplicative processing. | Reduces cost and cycle time. | | AutoClose / auto-response | Automated closure for records meeting predefined criteria, no-records-found workflow, final letter automation. | Reduces manual effort for low-risk transactions. | | Add-doc / pullback / repush | Support post-release correction, additional document delivery, removal/replacement of invalid packages. | Improves defect handling and audit control. | | Enhanced analytics | EDW integration, BI dashboards, VSignals/customer signals, quality dashboards, operational forecasting. | Improves oversight and continuous improvement. | | Veteran-facing self-service discovery | Discovery, design, and feasibility assessment for self-service records access, potentially through VA.gov, including a phased approach for known record types that may not require redaction. | Could reduce incoming Privacy Act request volume and improve Veteran transparency, but requires OIT, OMS, OGC, identity, records, and release-policy decisions. | | Record manifest / evidence transparency | Display what VA has received, what is pending, what has already been sent by the Veteran, and what may be available for reuse. | Helps Veterans understand the record inventory without immediately requiring a full Privacy Act production package. | | Repeat-request and package reuse | Reuse saved packages for second see-file requests and add only new records accumulated since the prior release when permitted. | Reduces redundant retrieval, redaction, packaging, and re-release effort. | | Duplicate and related-request management | Detect duplicate requests, identify concurrent Veteran/representative requests, and support feasibility analysis for merging or separately tracking related requests. | Improves queue hygiene, assignment accuracy, and accountability. | | Demand-reduction communications and form updates | Support communications campaign concepts, VAF 20-10206 update concepts, and policy-supported messaging to encourage specific document requests instead of broad C-file requests. | May reduce avoidable broad requests but requires leadership acceptance of communications and reputational risk. | ## Appendix H - Transition, Deployment, and Continuous Improvement The transition approach should reduce operational disruption and preserve continuity of Privacy Act/FOIA processing.

Deliverables

Source materials emphasize iterative deployment, agile development, release planning, regression testing, deployment checklists, rollback planning, production monitoring, and hypercare. * Transition planning should identify pre-award, post-award, mobilization, go-live, hypercare, and steady-state activities. * Release governance should distinguish maintenance, emergency/hotfix, optimization, minor, and major releases. * Deployment artifacts should include schedules, test evidence, Go/No-Go decisions, user communications, rollback plans, and post-deployment validation. * Agile delivery should use sprint planning, backlog management, traceability, HCD/user feedback, product roadmap, and KPI-driven prioritization. * Continuity planning should address data migration, historical access, portal availability, user support, ATO dependencies, staffing, PIV/access, and contractor transition-out. | Release type | Use | Controls | | --- | --- | --- | | Maintenance | Patching, routine security updates, planned system maintenance. | Scheduled windows, testing proportional to change, user notice when needed. | | Emergency / hotfix | Urgent remediation, source-system change, production defect, security or compliance issue. | Expedited approval, targeted testing, after-action reporting when appropriate. | | Minor release | Additional features with minimal workflow change. | Test plan, smoke testing, hypercare, user communication. | | Major release | Significant new feature or platform change. | Go/No-Go, release notes, training/change management, rollback plan, production validation, extended hypercare. | ## Appendix I - Reporting, Data, and Management Visibility The future service should provide actionable reporting for operational oversight, acquisition management, performance measurement, quality gates, customer outcomes, and continuous improvement.

Evaluation

What contract terms, data rights, transition provisions, Government-furnished artifacts, or evaluation criteria are most important to avoid incumbent advantage, support meaningful competition, and preserve SDVOSB, VOSB, small-business, or disadvantaged-business participation where appropriate?

Place of performance

Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Benefits Administration Acquisition Division 1800 G Street NW, Washington, DC, 20006, USA

Extracted from the official notice and archived solicitation files. Confirm controlling requirements in the source documents.

Notice information

Read full notice text

Prospective vendors that have access to the GSA Market Research as a Service (MRAS) RFI must submit their response via the GSA RFI. The SAM.gov RFI is only for firms not able to access and submit a response via the GSA MRAS RFI.

What changed

Aug 31, 2026 · 2 fields changed
DescriptionVA Privacy Act Request Fulfillment (PARF) Services This RFI has been issued via multiple sources including SAM.gov and GSA s Market Research as a Service. Interested vendors need only respond to the RFI once. VBA is conducting market research for a managed service to fulfill Privacy Act/FOIA records requests using automation, AI, human review, secure VA system integration, quality controls, electronic delivery, scalable processing, and continuous modernization to improve timeliness, quality, and cost. Interested vendors should provide the information requested below as well as respond to the attached questions: Company & POC Information: POC Email __________________________________________________ Company Name __________________________________________________ GSA Contract Number(s) (if applicable) __________________________________________________ POC Name __________________________________________________ POC Phone # __________________________________________________ UEI #: Unique Entity Identifier __________________________________________________ Business Size: ________________________________________________________________ s - small business o - other than small business Socioeconomic Categories (if applicable) _______________________________________ i.e. SDVOSB, VOSB, WOSB, 8a, etc.Prospective vendors that have access to the GSA Market Research as a Service (MRAS) RFI must submit their response via the GSA RFI. The SAM.gov RFI is only for firms not able to access and submit a response via the GSA MRAS RFI.
Documents67

Notice history

Attachments

Open a filename to view the saved source file. If a saved copy is not available yet, FedRoster will continue to the matching SAM.gov notice.

Back to top ↑