SPRRA226R0083 MULTIPLE LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM (MLRS) SPARES – LOCKHEED MARTIN SOLE SOURCE

The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) is issuing solicitation SPRRA2-26-R-0083 to meet the requirement of supporting the Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS). This is a sole-source action issued to Lockheed Martin Corporation (CAGE 64059) pursuant to the authority of Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) FAR 6.103-1(b); " only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements." NOUN NSN PART NUMBER QUANTITY CONTROL SECTION, GUI 1420-01-540-8608 13540365 35 The Government contemplates a Firm-Fixed-Pricing (FFP) single purchase effort. The basic terms and conditions of the contract shall govern the contractors and Governments' rights and obligations. A. The following timelines are proposed in this RFP: 1. Indicate your intention to provide a responsive proposal to this letter RFP in writing within five (5) business days. It is requested that a negative response be accompanied by an explanation. Responses shall be provided to the contracting team identified above. 2. Your response is requested as soon as possible. If you choose to submit a proposal in response to this RFP it shall be submitted on/or before 5:00 P.M. Central Standard Time (CST) October 30, 2026. B. Instructions for the proposal: 1. Please ensure that you read the entire RFP, including all of the enclosures, prior to submitting a proposal. The proposal shall be in full compliance with the instructions of this RFP. 2. This RFP is not an authorization to start work. 3. To assure maximum timeliness of proposal, the list of NSN/PNs numbers may be separated into more than one proposal with the understanding that the data requirements are not lessened by doing so. 4. Applicable, narratives, clauses, and provisions shall be reviewed prior to award. 5. Your proposal(s) shall remain valid for a minimum of ninety (60) days from receipt by the Government. 6. The offeror may propose alternative sole source parts for the requested items provided the alternative parts(s) have the same form, fit and function and is accompanied by a complete obsolescence notification letter detailing the reasons the contractor is unable to propose the requested part. 7. In the interest of supporting obsolete items and pursuant to communication with the Contracting Officer, in conjunction with the original part requested, an additional proposal for a "Single Purchase" of the Next Higher Assembly (NHA) may be accepted to support the function of a requested part. 8. Nothing in this RFP shall be construed to preclude the contracting officer from requiring the offeror to supply sufficient information to determine the reasonableness of price, regardless of whether the offeror was required to provide such information in connection with any earlier procurement. If the contracting officer determines that the pricing information submitted is not sufficient (see Section C of this RFP) to determine the reasonableness of price, the contracting officer may request other relevant information prior to accepting the proposal as adequate and consistent with the solicitation. 9. The proposal should include proposed order sizes, evidence-based delivery schedules, and price ranges. The Government expects the Offeror to propose only the quantities and price ranges that can be supported and is open to negotiating any items related to quantity or price ranges. The quantities requested are based on a government estimate and the offeror proposal shall support the unit prices for each part number provided. 10. Lockheed Martin shall only propose sole source items under this contract. Lockheed Martin shall notify the Government immediately if the items or services being solicited are not sole source to Lockheed Martin. 11. First Article (FAT) / Production Lot (PLT) MAY BE required. FAT unit MAY BE retained as a material standard. Test Item MAY BE destroyed as part of testing. First Article Test (FAT) and Production Lot Test (PLT) requirements for items listed in Enclosure 1 - Identification of Requirements, as applicable, MAY BE waived. Lockheed Martin may submit a first article test waiver worksheet. FAT/PLT units SHALL BE proposed until the waiver is approved. C. Proposal Content/Cost/Price Supporting documentation. At a minimum your proposal shall be addressed with the following: 1. The Government contemplates Firm-Fixed-Pricing for the NSN/Parts listed in Enclosure 1. This is an RFP for an NSN/Part support requirement generated by the Army Logistics Center (ALC). The add-on Identification of Requirements (IOR) and Packaging Sheets are provided in Enclosure 1. 2. The offeror must prepare pricing information, and proposal information in a Microsoft Excel file. The offeror's summary schedule must provide the Contract Line-Item Numbers (CLINs), National Stock Numbers (NSNs), Part Numbers (PNs) and Unit Price that reconciles with the total overall price offered and applicable data within the proposal. Along with the enclosure schedule, the offeror shall provide full supportable cost data substantiating the offeror's summary schedule for all CLINS and all unit price ranges proposed. 3. Should the proposal not require certification of cost and pricing data, the Offeror's attention is directed at the Federal Acquisition Regulation FAR 15.403-3, relative to the requirements for obtaining Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data. The Offeror is required to submit Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data with the submission of the proposal. If additional supporting documentation is requested, the government is seeking a timely response (5-10 business days). Failure to provide Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data will result in the offeror being deemed as inadequate and/or deficient. 4. If using ProPricer System Submission Requirements: To satisfy the requirement for submitting OTCP data, the Offeror shall provide the original, unedited ProPricer system-generated "Detail Cost Breakdown" report. This submission is mandatory. The file must be provided in its native Excel workbook format (.xlsx) with all original formulas, columns, and worksheets intact. Do not modify the file in any way after export. The submitted workbook must include, at a minimum, the following tabs: • P-Sheet • Direct Rates • Indirect Rates • CERs (if applicable) • CER Factors (if applicable) 5. If using Lockheed Martin 1LMX System Submission Requirements: Proposal shall include section C appendix C - formulized cost reports in excel workbook format (.xlsx). In addition to the hour, rate, and dollar elements, the government is requesting that one of the cost report tables (i.e. cost summary by year) include the following elements. • CLIN • Pool • Class of Cost Display • Year • BRC • Resource-ADLR • BRC Name • Cost Category 6. The proposal will identify key business unit personnel related to contracting, technical and pricing questions and known DCMA or DCAA business unit point of contract (POC) to expedite the question/review process. D. Additional Terms, Conditions, Clauses, and Provisions specific to this procurement needs and/or agency requirement: 1. In accordance with FAR clause 52.215-22, Limitation on Pass-Through charges, if Lockheed Martin intends to subcontract more than 70 percent of the total cost of work to be performed under the resulting contract, Lockheed Martin shall identify in its proposal a description of the value-added provided by Lockheed Martin as related to the work to be performed by the subcontractor(s) as defined by FAR Clause 52.215-23. 2. DFARS Clause 252.211-7003, Item Unique Identification and Valuation may be applicable to the item in this Letter RFP. 3. Arms Export Control may be required and when applicable the technical data package will be provided via the DOD safe site, https://safe.apps.mil/ , which contains technical data whose export is restricted by the arms export control act (TITLE 22 U.S.C., SEC 2751 ET SEQ.) or Executive Order 12470. Violation of these export laws are subject to severe criminal penalties. Due to current SAM.GOV software constraints, technical data packages cannot be attached to this notice. Interested parties must submit a request for technical data packages via email to contract specialist point of contact listed below. Ensure the PRON number is entered in the subject line of the email. Once requests are received, the technical data packages will be sent via the DOD safe site, https://safe.apps.mil/. Interested parties have 7 calendar days to retrieve and download the TDP from the DOD safe site before the link expires. Export Control requires the applicable certifications to be current for both the quoter and manufacturer. The offeror and any source(s) of supply it will use for contract performance must have an active United States/Canada Joint Certification Program (JCP) certification to access export-controlled data. DLA does not intend to delay award in order for an ineligible offeror its source(s) supply to apply for and receive authority approval to access the export-controlled data. 4. For Long Lead Time Items and/or Long Term Contracts, the parties recognize there is a risk that part(s) or component(s) required for performance of the contract/purchase order may become unavailable due to obsolescence. Upon receipt of the contract/purchaseorder, contractor is responsible for verifying its sources of supply. If at any time during the course of performance contractor becomes aware that it is unable to procure a part or component necessary to fulfill the requirements of the contract, the contractor shall notify the contracting officer in writing within thirty days. Notification shall include contractors recommendation for correction of the problem, if possible, with estimated cost and schedule impact, if any. The contracting officer will determine the appropriate course of action and provide direction to the contractor. In no event will contractor proceed with implementation of its recommendation without written direction from the contracting officer. At the sole discretion of the contracting officer, the contract may be terminated in whole or in part, as appropriate. 5. Product Quality Deficiency Reports (PQDRs): When requested by the Government, the Contractor shall assist the AvMC Systems Readiness Directorate (SRD) or the cognizant Contract Administration Office in evaluating PQDRs and exhibits for defects reported on components overhauled under this contract to determine the root cause for deficiencies. These defects may be reported from field or depot organizations. A final report should be given no later than 75 days after receipt of PQDR exhibit. Corrective action to prevent repeat discrepancies shall be an integral part of the Contractor's Quality Program. The contractor shall not bill the Government as a direct charge for cooperation with the Government in the resolution of any PQDRs. If a deficiency is discovered on a component provided as Government Furnished Material (GFM) that has not been identified as part of the overhaul process and cannot be repaired by the contractually authorized technical data, the Contractor shall contact the contracting office to determine if a Product Quality Deficiency Report (PQDR) is required. If required, the contractor shall coordinate with the cognizant DCMA office to have a PQDR submitted or the Contractor shall utilize the Product Data Reporting and Evaluation Program (PDREP) to submit a PQDR at https://www.pdrep.csd.disa.mil/pdrep_files/report_tools/pqdr.htm IAW AR 702-7-1, Reporting of Product Quality Deficiencies within the U.S. Army. 6. All communications SHALL be submitted in writing ONLY and directly to the contract team(s) email addresses identified on the first page of this RFP. Lockheed Martin shall not contact any other Government personnel other than the person(s) identified. Contacting any Government personnel other than the individual(s) identified above could result in an organizational conflict of interest (COI). 7. Army Contract Writing System (ACWS) Transition Information for Contractors: DLA Huntsville utilizes the U.S. Army's Contracting Enterprise (ACE) systems. ACE is in the process of deploying new solicitation and contract writing software to army contracting offices worldwide. Known as the Army Contract Writing System (ACWS), this modern software suite will soon replace most existing army contract writing systems, including the system used to create and release this contract. During this transition period, contractors are hereby advised: A. The contracting office may use any combination of contract writing systems to generate distributable copies of this contract during its period of performance, as well as any subsequent modifications or orders (if applicable). As a result: i. Subsequent documents you receive may appear noticeably different than the original award or previous contractual documents from the same contracting office. ii. A change between contract writing systems may cause important information concerning contract terms and conditions to take on different formatting or appear in different parts of later documents issued. iii. Contractors shall ensure Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems and personnel interacting with this contract are prepared to identify and respond appropriately to differences between document versions. B. The government does not intend to use the shift between contract writing systems to effect any changes to contract terms and conditions. Therefore: i. Contractors should view changes to terms or conditions between document versions as system-generated and potentially erroneous unless accompanied by narrative(s) designating such changes as deliberate and desired. ii. Contractors shall inform the contracting officer listed on the first page of the most recent document issued for guidance regarding any suspected or observed inadvertent or system-generated changes (e.g. noticing something missing in a new conformed copy). iii. The government will correct any inadvertent or system-generated changes, additions, or omissions discovered by either party, via bilateral modification, at no cost to the contractor. iv. The terms and conditions contained in the latest document reflecting deliberate action by the contracting officer (e.g. the last conformed copy of the award not affected by the observed issue) will take precedence until these problems are corrected. C. In the unlikely event award information is corrupted or mutilated during system migration and replacement or re-issuance of this contract is necessary for continued contract administration, the contracting officer will: i. Issue a continuation contract in accordance with DFARS 204.1601(c) and DFARS PGI 204.1601(c), carrying over all terms and conditions from the last-known version of this contract accurately reflecting mutual agreement of the parties. ii. Incorporate the last-known version of this contract accurately reflecting mutual agreement of the parties as an attachment to the replacement or continuation contract for future reference. iii. Ensure any such reissuance or continuance is properly reported to preserve the integrity of contractor performance measurement data, if any (E.G. FAPIIS, CPARS). 8. Small Business Subcontracting Plan: the contractor shall continue participation in the Department of Defense (DoD) Test Program for a Comprehensive Subcontracting Plan with the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA). A small business subcontracting plan will not be required by the Government for this subsumable,increment add-on, or delivery order contracts unless the contractor fails to meet the goals outlined in the comprehensive subcontracting plan agreement with DCMA. 9.Progress Payments FAR 52.232-16 may be included in the subsequent delivery order. Ifprogress payments are desired, they shall be expressly requested in the proposal. ProgressPayments will be discussed to during negotiations. 10.Additional narratives, clauses, and provisions that are applicable to the part is listed inEnclosure 1. If you have any questions, feel free to contact Mari Bretz at hecmari.bretz@dla.mil.