Response deadlineSep 17, 2026, 6:00 PM UTC
Deadline status14 days remaining
PostedAug 28, 2026
Record refreshedSep 2, 2026
Place of performanceWashington, DC, United States
Opportunity summary
Source-citedThe Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts seeks a Software as a Service (SaaS) video streaming platform for hosting, management, and distribution services. Responses are due by September 17, 2026, and submissions must be via email to specified addresses. [1][5]
Key points
- Contractor must provide a SaaS video streaming service platform. [1]
- Evaluation considers Technical Approach, Past Performance, and Price. [3]
Watch items
- Standardized process for reporting platform issues is required. [2]
- Quote submission must include all requested general information. [4]
Sources
- USCA26Q0172_08.07.2026.pdf
1.6 DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS Symbol Definition USCA26Q0172 - Page 8 of 34 AOUSC Administrative Office of the United States Courts FJC Federal Judicial Center DCN Data Communications Network FTP File Transfer Protocol HTML Hyper-text Markup Language SLA Service Level Agreement XML Extensible Markup Language VOD Video-on-Demand COR Contracting Officer's Representative OPA Office of Public Affairs VPS Video Production Services 2.0 REQUIREMENTS The Contractor shall provide a software as a service (SaaS) video streaming service platform with the following requirements.
- USCA26Q0172_08.07.2026.pdf
The contractor shall provide a standardized process for reporting platform issues, via email, phone call or through an online management system.
- USCA26Q0172_08.07.2026.pdf
Provision(s) Incorporated By Reference, see Provision B-1 Clause Title Fill-ins 2-85A Evaluation Inclusive of Options M-1 Basis of Award Basis of Award USCA26Q0172 - Page 32 of 34 The Judiciary intends to make a single award to the responsible quoter providing a quote that conforms to the requirements of the solicitation, which is determined to represent the best value to the Judiciary based on the following evaluation factors: Factor 1: Technical Approach Factor 2: Past Performance Factor 3: Price For this evaluation, non-price factors (technical approach and past performance) are of equal importance.
- USCA26Q0172_08.07.2026.pdf
3.0 – Quote Submission 3.1 General Information Submission The submitted quote shall provide all the information requested below.
- Official SAM.gov notice
Set-aside: No Set aside used
Generated from the public notice and source-backed solicitation passages. Confirm important requirements in the cited brief and official documents.
Public-source intelligence
Source-backed opportunity brief
8 citations · 6 sourcesExcept for software licenses provided by the vendor contemporaneously with the Government’s payment, and publications printed or recorded in any way for the auditory or visual use of the agency, any language requiring the Government to pay for more than the value of services already provided or articles already delivered is hereby deleted unless expressly authorized in writing by the Contracting Officer and provided for in the schedule of supplies/services. (xv) Insurance.
Scope
1.6 DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS Symbol Definition USCA26Q0172 - Page 8 of 34 AOUSC Administrative Office of the United States Courts FJC Federal Judicial Center DCN Data Communications Network FTP File Transfer Protocol HTML Hyper-text Markup Language SLA Service Level Agreement XML Extensible Markup Language VOD Video-on-Demand COR Contracting Officer's Representative OPA Office of Public Affairs VPS Video Production Services 2.0 REQUIREMENTS The Contractor shall provide a software as a service (SaaS) video streaming service platform with the following requirements.
Deliverables
The contractor shall provide a standardized process for reporting platform issues, via email, phone call or through an online management system.
Evaluation
Provision(s) Incorporated By Reference, see Provision B-1 Clause Title Fill-ins 2-85A Evaluation Inclusive of Options M-1 Basis of Award Basis of Award USCA26Q0172 - Page 32 of 34 The Judiciary intends to make a single award to the responsible quoter providing a quote that conforms to the requirements of the solicitation, which is determined to represent the best value to the Judiciary based on the following evaluation factors: Factor 1: Technical Approach Factor 2: Past Performance Factor 3: Price For this evaluation, non-price factors (technical approach and past performance) are of equal importance.
Submission
3.0 – Quote Submission 3.1 General Information Submission The submitted quote shall provide all the information requested below.
Eligibility
Set-aside: No Set aside used
Place of performance
Washington, DC, USA
Key dates
Posted Aug 28, 2026; Responses due Sep 17, 2026, 6:00 PM UTC; Archive date Oct 2, 2026
Extracted from the official notice and archived solicitation files. Confirm controlling requirements in the source documents.